MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN
O XIV, R1 The property in the pre-emption act of Punjab (I of 1913), section 2 (3) and 16 of the dispute was immovable property, the appellate court withdrew despite the fact that such a case was not a proceeding proceeding. Was also not staged. In the suit or in the appeal as a preliminary objection to maintaining the jurisdiction on the ground that the land in dispute was not agricultural land and it was located within the limits of the municipality, it was prejudiced in the written statement that appropriate evidence This is due to the lack of proper evidence. Was not presented by the parties, the trial was sent to the trial court after compiling and determining the matters arising out of the objections raised in the written statement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Pindi bhohri lawyer
