Find a Lawyer

FAHEED GUL ALIAS FAREED GUL versus STATE

The accused were arrested on the spot on the testimony of Section 9 (c) evidence while the smuggling of a large quantity of marijuana in a truck, the prosecution witness's testimony at the time, place, recovery of the prohibited charge and his confiscation from the secret caves. Agreed and disagreed on the points. Chemical Examiner's vehicle report was positive. It was impossible to take such a large quantity of intoxicants, after which the defendant's case was simple refusal and he did not blame the officers for any misconduct, hostility or dishonesty in the investigation. It is said that the accused were not accused of recovering large quantities of drugs, and it was explained to them that they did not know about the drugs in the secret caves of the truck, neither was it reasonable or not. Dependent, prosecution was identified in the trial for illegal, malicious or irresponsible, domestic charges were again brought under circumstances beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was impeachment / checking and the prosecution witness's checking party. And his presence was of a natural nature, and so was a competent witness like any other independent witness. And their evidence simply could not be excluded. Because he was successfully prosecuted by the prosecution in the case of being a department official, the defense lawyer was unable to identify any wrongdoing or illegal, misrepresentation or non-reading of the evidence. In the trial cases, the trial was retained advocate from Tando Adam lawyer