Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NOORAN MAI versus SHAFT MUHAMMAD


West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 9 (6) The West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R13 The ex parte decree to set aside the application against section 9 (6) for the person against whom the ex parte decree was passed. Was open for Provision of Rule 13 of the West Pakistan Family Courts to show cause of law within the reasonable time of separation of the Family Court, set a period of 30 days for such an order. Was in conflict with the provisions of Section 9. Regarding the Act and it is important to say that what was the appropriate time for the delivery of the Act will depend on the strange facts of each case if a person is completely negligent if he fails to make any attempt to know it. Here is a case for what happened, as he did not have to wait more than 5 years to file an application for a previous party decree.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Tobatek Singh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.