MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus RALLEY KHAN
The Canal and Drainage Act 1873 Section 70 Notice of Service Outlet's notice to the shareholders was a legal requirement and does not challenge the order of the justices under the principles of natural justice which would cause the notice to apply to the shop. Is not performed on all shareholders of. Niether specifically admitted in this case that he was not presented with the notice, nor did he present any evidence that he had not been presented with legal notice against the defendants, not just the record. Was established on the basis of the evidence of the defendants, but upon admission, the requirement of the plaintiffs, legal notice, was fully met, even if any principle of natural justice was violated, After the hearing in the appeal filed before the irregular appellate authority, it will be fine.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Pirpai lawyer
