Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAOOF versus GULZAR BCGUM

Section 2 (g) (j) of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963 and the relationship between the landlord and tenant tenant / appellant denied the presence of the landlord and tenant, but the controller of the rent stated that the parties Such relations between the parties proved to be on record, they were ordered to be expelled immediately. The defendant's appellant's attorney acknowledged in cross-examination that the appellant's name was recorded as the owner, while the defendant's name was not present in the record as the owner and the property tax of the disputed premises was also paid by the appellant. Was made and the defendant's attorney no longer admitted. He did not have any evidence to show that the appellant was a tenant in the house in dispute and further admitted that the transfer of the house in dispute in favor of the original transfer from which the respondent had purchased It was enough to decide the issue of the existence of the landlord's relationship with the attorney, held later for such respondents, with its name revoked and against the respondents. The finding of the tenant and the appellant in favor of the tenant was not sustained as a result of the misrepresentation of the evidence on record. Could be. family advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer