ALTAF AHMAD versus STATE
Corruption Act 1947 Section 5 (2) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 charged with illicit littering, Patwari Laksh demanded bribe to reduce abusive money and accused accused of accepting money The conversation between the witnesses, the complainant, the magistrate and the investigating officer, heard by the raiding party, witnessed the acceptance of the money through the trust of the magistrate evidence examined, the defendants at the time of arrest for the collection of the money. Witnesses were attracted and none of them was present when the litigation was heard. Evidence, held, can be safely relied upon in retained sentences
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Taxila lawyer
