Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD KHAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT

Sections 3 and 10 of the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Permanent Retirement Appellant from the service of exchange of fines for which a disciplinary action was taken. On the basis of mismanagement and negative comments in his annual secret report, he was dismissed, inquired against the appellant and the Inquiry Officer confirmed some of the allegations leveled against him. The competent authority ordered the appellant to be dismissed and to file an appeal against the judgment. The competent authority, the service tribunal, appealed the decision to convert the dismissal from employment to a mandatory retirement did not raise any specific question about the law of public importance, Article 1212 of the Constitution Service Tribunal added. Did not find any suitable and co-operative in the scope of the statement, solid evidence to convict the appellant of corruption, but he was found guilty of judicial ineligibility, conduct of conduct, irregularity and criminal judicial officer Was. The fact is that no legal error or misrepresentation of record was suffered and fully authorized. There is no specific question of the law of public importance and there is no scope for interference with the exercise of jurisdiction, the authority to properly verify, modify, vary and modify the quantum of punishment. After that, both appeals were dropped. By the Supreme Court when you need a advocate from Kotri lawyer