ZILA COUNCIL, SHEIKHUP.URA THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR versus MUHAMMAD ARIF
Explanation of first appeal in section 107 (2) and O XLI, Rr 1, 3 High Court, after removing its defect, the application for withdrawal of appeal should be rejected by the High Court as filed by the appellant. Miscellaneous request to be excluded. With the amended memo of the High Court of Appeal, instead of submitting updated appeals, this miscellaneous application could not be moved because the appeal was already dismissed because the appellant withdrew only one of the fresh appeal appeals. That was still available to them. The verdict was not subject to any legal defect, if the appellant was advised, he could recover it by filing a new appeal before the High Court against the judgment / decree passed by the trial court and giving the respondents all the means possible. Will have the opportunity to raise legal and factual requests and objections. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal with such observations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Patoki lawyer
