MST. IMTIAZ BEGUM versus MST. SULTAN JAN
In the amendment, Section 115 review petitioner filed a separate petition before the High Court seeking withdrawal of his amendment on the basis of agreement with the respondent but said that the petition was not decided by the High Court, and the decision was taken Has been postponed until the time of the final decision of the review, no order was passed in the final decision which was also submitted in another review and the only reference was in the pending review questions and No free / supportive order / decision was adopted in this regard. The relevant review is valid, it was not a complete and exhaustive decision of the controversy; the questions of law and facts contained in the relevant review obtained the remand of the case by putting aside an unclean decision regarding the relevant review before the High Court Supreme Court. The High Court is considering pending the relevant review before deciding whether to file a miscellaneous application before the relevant review is provided by the applicant as well as giving the parties a hearing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Pir Mahal lawyer