Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

R 4 (1) (b) (i) Basic Rules, R 29 Department authority to impose any type of public servant, whether on a lower rank or time scale or at a lower level in the time scale, Was eligible Penalty is permissible under R4 (1) (b) (i) of the Punjab Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975, but the basic rule 29 can still be ignored, if any government The employee is in the account. In the event of mismanagement or disqualification, at a lower party or position, or at a lower stage in its time scale, then the authority authorizing the authority will specify the period for which it will be useful and, on the occasion of rehabilitation, It will work Postpone future increments and, if so, to what extent the competent authority, in the present case, did not set a specific or fixed time to punish employees for which the penalty was imposed, , There was no sustainable reduction. The first issue did not mean that the lower rank or time scale or any lower stage should be reduced after the Punjab Civil Servant (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1975, section 4 (1) (b) (i). The time scale, which shows that the lower rank should generally be limited to one stage only and not further, is that the use of the word was important because it was not multi-dimensional. Only one or something is indicated, but it is sometimes used too often. Sensefully and therefore, even if taken in the meaning of its ordinary dictionary, it can mean one of the intentions and it can mean any of the many principles. divorce advocates from Muridkay lawyer