Section 302 (b) / 34 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185, because of the close relationship with the deceased, the complainant by the High Court, including the complainant, were interested witnesses who were mainly dishonest witnesses. Went on to give evidence with no motive other than to tell the truth and even routinely suppressed the evidence that was suppressed by the prosecution of the accused person so that they could not be traced. ? It does not appear to have occurred in this way because the case of the alleged prosecutor was of serious suspicion and was full of confusion. Eyewitnesses have shown negligence with the fact which has led to the High Court. It cannot be said that any reasonable person must ultimately reach the reasons which the High Court had given to the accused for the benefit of the doubt. They were neither irrelevant nor according to the disappointing record the appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
