Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

The accused and co-accused were not mentioned in the FIR in the Complaint Grant, Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) bail, They were involved. In a subpoena before the Investigation Officer on the same day, the commission of the crime, without disclosing how the accused complainant's name was found, had taken a U-turn from his previous position and this fact Has made this matter. In addition, after a delay of 74 days in recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses, it was pointed out that the second version was presented by the prosecution after consideration, which could have a negative impact. The co-accused in the prosecution case had already been granted bail by the Supreme Court because on the principle of consistency the accused was entitled to exemption on bail. Appeal was changed to appeal and it was allowed in the circumstances and accordingly the accused was allowed. The approved interim bail was confirmed property advocates from Astore lawyer