Find a Lawyer

HAJI DILDAR KHAN versus STATE

Arts 204 and 185 (2) (c) contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 3 contempt court accused himself at the mercy of the Supreme Court, saying that he was the most Is very respectful and cannot do that. Thinking about the contempt of court, and that he had no intention of contempt of court, nor had he ever done so, the accused also expressed regret and regret if his remarks were presented. The sight of a judge of the High Court Supreme Court would have given him the impression. An appeal was granted by the accused, seeking apology and keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, and the license to act as an advocate of the accused was also restored, keeping its sentence and sentence aside. patent advocate from Amangarh lawyer