Find a Lawyer

FAHEEM AHMED FAROOQUI versus STATE

Section 365 An Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Evidence Overview Benefits of Suspicion The evidence of the prosecutor was extremely offensive and faced serious weaknesses and contradictions, in addition to the naked allegations in the FIR, linking the accused No crime was found on file for. Neither the alleged kidnapper came out of the suspect's custody with the commission of the crime, nor was there any evidence presented to pay the ransom, nor did the complainant's statement that the accused's case in this case Was hand and he was the author. No attempt was made to the offense that no kidnapping or abduction case was filed and it was found to be a punishable offense under Section 6565A, PPC and section (e) of the Anti-Terrorism Act. In 1997, he was not attracted to the alleged kidnapping of the kidnappers by the accused in this case, but the identity of the ransom amount was held six days after the arrest of the accused. And the trial court acquitted the accused on the same evidence that was believed and relied upon, without fulfilling the requirements of the partner company, In particular, when it was extended to the accused was acquitted of the charge of the doubt. Co-accused was not challenged by either party or the complainant was acquitted in state benefits and conditions. list of advocates from Phool nagar lawyer