Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) sentenced to scrutiny of evidence, reduction of recovery witnesses was free and involuntary witness and unanimously prosecuted the raid and recovery in the accused's hotel. Version of was supported From his possession at the relevant time, Chaucer says that like other witnesses, Syed witnesses were such good and respectable witnesses and their statements could not be dismissed simply because they did not comply with the provisions of section 103. The objection to the CCP was misunderstood, as under section 25 of the Control of Narcotic Substance Act 1997, not citing any public witness was not fatal to a prosecution case, as section 103 , The CRPC was specifically dismissed from its plea for intoxication cases. To the extent that only 10 grams of marijuana was sent to the Chemical Examiner for analysis, it did not have to be weighed. It did not need to be sent for the entire prohibited analysis. The rest of the amount was not transferred to the trial court, nor were the recovery witnesses advised that the remaining wholesalers were not. The Chemical Examiner's report confirmed the evidence of the prosecution. The material recovered from the accused \ marijuana \ is only a confirmation of the allegation that he was lied to in this case, by him. There was no attempt to be positive. The result was that the accused had a deliberate delinquency, so it was maintained that the accused had spent a large part of his punitive sentence and that law firms from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer