Find a Lawyer

SAMIULLAH versus JAMIL AHMED

A review of the evidence of Clause 302 (c) and 337L proved the cause of the attack by the accused on the prosecution witnesses, who was killed and injured, and the presence and credibility of the witnesses was established at the scene of the incident, The natural witnesses who were natural witnesses, and like any other independent witness, had no ill-will or hatred by the prosecution's witnesses or the police; any basis for the prosecution's testimony to prove my relationship with the victim was false. If this was a straightforward, fair and confident statement of the injured eye witnesses was very important, c. Only the prosecution's version was sufficient to establish that the Ocular testimony proved the accused's recovery of the weapon from the accused and the medical evidence had confessed to his presence, besides the presence of eyewitnesses on the occasion and, thus, the facts of the pro. Confirmation of the Factors Supported By the confession, the accused was under the age of 18 and was entitled to a lesser sentence during the crime, because according to the integration of Islam, the conviction of the perpetrators was not applicable to his case and the accused were guilty. Was maintained under conditions. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kotli Loharan lawyer