Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GHULAM HABIB versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN


Section 302/201/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal against the aforesaid principles was not identified as any writ of misrepresentation or non-assessment of evidence of the guarantee of the Supreme Court, submitted by the High Court. There was nothing wrong with the reasons being made. The acquittal of the accused found grounds in favor of the High Court in approving the unwanted verdict, which was neither hypothetical nor speculative nor had the support of the material on record. There was no need to interfere with the decision to go bad unless there were very strong reasons. The High Court properly appreciated and examined the material on record; the case for decision malfunction, the Supreme Court refused to intervene.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.