Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD versus M. MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN

Evidence of the specific performance of the contract for the sale of Arts 17 (2) (a) and 30 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 suit document execution (contract) Proof of proof to the evidence In the event of refusal, the other party must rely on such a document in accordance with the methods of proof of its execution as stated in the Law of Martyrdom, 1984, and such party must Had to observe the rule of production. In the present case, to prove the execution of the sale agreement, the plaintiff produced the document `` Scribet, '' which acknowledged the execution of the contract when it appeared in court and clearly stated that it had a thumb. Signed and signed. Through the executor and the minor witnesses; his statement was confirmed by the document, which testified to his signature on the same signature; the witness was the one who saw not only the document executing but also a witness. As well as the person who wrote or was the `script of a document 'was as good a witness as any other body, if he had signed the document as a witness, the author of a document would have confirmed it. There was no legal hereditary inability to be a witness where a minor witness, other than that, was the author of the document. The All-Court appeared and dismissed that the contract was written by him and that the fingerprints and signatures were kept by the defendants, in the author's statement that the statement of a minor witness could be considered circumstance \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Hangu lawyer