Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM MUSTAFA versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH


R4 (1) (b) (iv) Appeal against the appellant serving as junior clerk of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), section 4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3), dismissed from employment. Demand for notice and inquiry into the allegations made against them for fraud and forgery charges - revealed that as a result of the audit of accounts in the office, the petitioner accused of appearing in his response, refused to act forgery and embezzlement. Did not, and on the occasion of his admission by the petitioner, he accepted his responsibility for the act of embezzlement, in view of these factual facts, hardly against it. Aqaadh inquiry needed to facts that did not need to accept the rules of natural justice had been fully implemented. The petitioner was observed before proceeding and imposed a fine and no question was raised about the law of public importance; the application was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Sagri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.