Find a Lawyer

ELAHI BAKHSH versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Section 22 (41) of the Specific Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Sections 8 and 42 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) asserts that the claim of ownership of the property is vacant. The property was purchased in the dispute through a public auction organized by the Pass Department and PTD, while the petitioner for the declaration in his favor claimed that the property was vacant and the department had no jurisdiction to settle. It should move the respondents to the same issue. And the appellate court dismissed the respondents' and injunctive claims filed by the petitioner, but the High Court reversed the concurrent inquiry of the courts below, and always lodged a criminal suit against the property of the respondent. Was considered a property of eviction, which was properly purchased by the respondent by the defendant. Regarding the question of the real estate department, the court cannot proceed with the civil court in the absence of anyone except the constitutional circumstances such as the custodian / deputy custodian's section 22 (41) of Pakistan. Was used under the (Administration of Equal Property) Act 1957 in the relevant time the concept of accuracy was associated with governmental proceedings, in the circumstances the intervention was justified, usually in the results of the two courts listed below. Also, the Supreme Court was not expected to give its facts to the High Court. Exchange will build until they have to face not read or misrepresentation or similar evidence did not violate any rule of law. Any legal weakness female advocates from Daska lawyer