Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, VEHARI

VII XVII, R3 Law, after the closure of this right of the Opposition to examine the evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 133 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1993 witnesses. The legal status of the lawyer to whom the evidence was filed was refused for the purpose of refusing to postpone the petition, for which the negative party knew whether to bring the negative party to his or her own new lawyer. Given the time to engage, the case was adjourned at 8am for this purpose. From 3pm to 3pm, witnesses' statements were recorded in the presence of a newly appointed lawyer, who did not give him the opportunity to examine the witnesses, a witness was summoned from Karachi, claiming adjustment Can't be done because the trial court / tribunal had discretion to dismiss or deny the adversary party took advantage of 35 excuses or in a case where the High Court constitutional jurisdiction could be exercised. The court / tribunal extended its jurisdiction or proceeded to trial without any jurisdiction. Refusing to postpone the writ, the illegal or defamatory High Court rightly dismissed the constitutional petition. top advocates from Quetta lawyer