Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QADIR versus STATE

Section 324/396/449/148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXII of 1997), Section 7 Law Testimony (10 of 1984), Article 22 Disposing of Evidence Benefits of Suspicion Identify mistakes and misconduct paid by each accused. There was no explanation of why one of the accused was acquitted by the trial court, while all three were sentenced and sentenced to death, whose conviction was upheld by the High Court in the legal proceedings of the identity parade where the accused. The role played in his crime was raised without explanation, the victim of illegal acts and instability completely unacceptable without any identifiable cost. The material possibility that the police had identified by the witnesses before the identity parade could not be excluded, while giving the accused the benefit of the doubt, the convictions and convictions filed by the trial court aside. The High Court and the accused maintained. Exempt from the charge property advocates from Rashidabad lawyer