DR. ALTAF HUSSIAN GARDEZI versus CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Removal of services on the basis of the results of a departmental inquiry under the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1975, on charges of constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) by public servants. ? , Without publicizing the posts, without preparation of the merit list and over and above the sanctioned power, the government employee was pardoned in two consecutive interrogations, in the present case the inquiry was declared ex parte and the record showed. That the above mentioned process was flawed. The legal status of the inquiry was to prove the alleged misconduct proceedings against a public servant and the public servant could not be held guilty for this charge simply because he failed to prosecute, leaving civil servants in charge. The exclusion charges were dismissed by government employees who were alleged to have been violated by law by public servants, and their cases were re-run on their own merits. The decision was sent to the authorities, a government employee imposed The punishment for removing liability from the job will, in the circumstances, be severe, inappropriate and out of proportion and sufficient to end the mandatory retirement penalty. The apex court converted the appeal for leave to appeal and allowed it accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Haripur lawyer
