Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMAD FAISAL versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 45 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXVII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The misinformation to the insurance company was issued after the death of the plaintiff's father, which was issued on the ground. Were not broken. That at the time of obtaining the insurance policy, the plaintiff's father had given an incorrect date which the suit filed by the plaintiffs was simultaneously dismissed by the trial court as well as the wrong date of the plaintiff's father by the High Court at that time. Birth approval was also his conscious act of obtaining an insurance policy Defendant's father deliberately misinterprets his date of birth and finds that it is 3 19 1940 and the disclosure company is wrong only The date given was that of the defendant's father himself, a sales manager. The insurance company and the insurance company were aware of the work and were well-equipped to trade tricks. Both courts, together, found that the plaintiffs had failed to prove that their father's history at the time of obtaining the insurance policy. The birth was 8 3 1945 instead of 8 3 1940, false information and fake details were presented and the policy was obtained by practicing fraud. Both decisions were in accordance with the evidence on record, and according to the law on the subject, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the adjudication, and both the courts denied the leave of appeal. \ R \ n immigration advocate from North Wazirstan lawyer