Find a Lawyer

PETROSIN CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD versus MOL PAKISTAN OIL AND GAS CO

O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Declaration of Permanent Order and grant of license for processing of oil and gas on request of application The applicants' reasoning before submitting tender documents was that the process of awarding the contract was not transparent except for the applicants. Without giving them a chance to hear and some government officials were corrupted by contracting at the expense of the state treasury and requested that a permanent injunction be granted and that the process be declared illegal, without authority or jurisdiction. To be given And the financially-validated Volatility Petitioners' Quality Management System Certificate was valid for one year and expired at the time of submission of their previous qualification documents. He said his certificate was renewed two months after the due date for submitting the documents. Impact In the absence of any valid / renewed certification, applicants' documents were properly denied by the applicant's authority contention that they were not provided a hearing. The tendering process for the applicants was completed in the form of a self-addressed letter from the Authority giving reasons for regret and was given to the contracting party, which was reduced in writing and is now in process. Is. The petitioners did not claim any relief against the above party, who had invested huge sums in this regard - any order to stop everything would be illegal and unfair. power of attorney advocate Timergara lawyer