CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN ENGINEERING COUNCIL, ISLAMABAD versus MUHAMMAD MAJID HANIF
Sections 10 and 14 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) College Approval by the Pakistan Engineering Council College In the present case, the Pakistan Engineering Council was approved in the year 2007, but only with the Beach Intake and Nothing was mentioned in relation to the students who were enrolled in the college only in 2003 and the matter was under consideration as the correspondence was being approached by the parties with the batch intake approved in 2007. Was given only 2003 means, as a result it was not possible to admit but it was with previous effect in this regard Pakistan Engineering Cons Lee's contention was that because this college lacked the required qualifications / facilities before 2007, it could not afford approval. But in this argument the root causes of its ruin were for the simple reason that if the college lacked the required qualifications. Ann, before 2007, then confirmed how the Pakistan Engineering Council could be approved with the 2003 decision intake, therefore, clearly concluded that in 2003, too, the college The lack of required qualifications for teaching materials and equipment was the real cause and future failure of the Pakistan Engineering Council for those students (Bach 1999) who worked full day and night to achieve success. , The council could not be allowed to defuse or destroy the college for no reason, the council also failed to state that other associations had been denied by the Pakistan Engineering Council. How Appeals for Vacation Appeals were Approved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gilgit lawyer