MST. ZARINA BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD MOINUDDIN
Article 42, 54 54 and Constitution 55 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the issue of a permanent and mandatory injunction was decided and the competing parties included their evidence, in the final analysis, The High Court had pronounced the verdict. And the appeal filed before the Division Bench also failed; the petitioner sought leave for appeal, such as delay in filing the case, alleged title of the plot in question and the lease of the said plot, were involved in the case. Was asked to detect it. The High Court was based on false reading and non-reading of the record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Sehar Baqlas lawyer
