MRS. PARVEEN ASIF versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD.
Article 2 The appeal delay for the appeal was delayed for five days, the petition was delayed, the petition was granted, in view of which, the general account of the applicant's disability was given. Went, without showing that he was completely disabled and was prevented from communicating with the AOR or that the applicant's son was suffering from hypertension and depression, according to the A Section C Council for the applicant. And was advised to rest for a month which was applied to the court office from 16 9 2005 to 16 10 2005. On 11/11, calculated the period after. Nonetheless, if the applicant could sue the High Court through a lawyer sitting at home, she could have challenged the invalid order within a timely manner by a lawyer, presenting no satisfactory account of the delay. Was not, for the sake of extension of time, because the applicant's prayer for extension of time was rejected and the application was stopped and with time removed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
