WAZIR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ARIF QURESHI
A. XXXVII, Articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for recovery of money on the claim note, unconditional leave to defend the case was enjoined by the defendant. An order was granted for leave to appeal under the order that no competent fraud ground was granted for the sanction of leave because the respondent's refusal to implement the promise notice was denied even if the defendant Even if an argument and a strong case were to be filed, the leave should still be granted on the condition of solvent security or bank guarantee, but the High Court Both benches failed to consider this aspect of the case and were granted unconditional leave to defend the case without gaining the applicant's valuable interest so as to allow the appeal to be considered on the question of law. Whether or not the High Court was justified in approving the anonymous order and whether it could be retained under the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer