Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus HAQ NAWAZ KHURRAM

Sections 302 and 308 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) affirmed the testimony of the Court of Appeal, the defense did not present any evidence in support of the accused's version, a prosecution witness said that it was true that The defendant first made a statement before the Investigation Officer that he had killed both of the victims indiscriminately when they stabbed his daughters, but it is equally true that on the basis of his defense request, the lie was given to the injured. Retained fire victims were admitted and confirmed by medical evidence for firearms. Although it was stated by the accused in his statement that another incident had already taken place, but said that the incident was not reported to the police nor to any other agency and defense. Has provided no evidence to prove the incident. Fourteen blanks were recovered from the spot, of which ten were recovered from pistols recovered from the accused and two from the other co-accused, however, no pistol was found in the remaining four blanks as no pistol was found. Was. Recovery from the third co-accused; that the recovery of the pistol from the accused and the two accomplices was established directly from the evidence. According to the suspect's version, on the day of the incident, the two suspects gathered at the service station of the accused and advised that they had come to teach the lesson, even according to the suspect's position the weapon was not armed with any weapons and he If the accused had any misconduct and intention to attack the accused, they would have armed themselves with deadly weapons. That is, with three pistols recovered from the accused and two accomplices law firms from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer