Find a Lawyer

SALAHUDDIN TIRMIZI versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

Preamble Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 175 [as amended (Constitution) Order (5 of 2007), Article 2] and 225 Electoral Disputes of the Islamabad High Court approved by the Election Commission of Pakistan Works in this regard in Islamabad. Election of the NWFP will be a challenge to both the Islamabad High Court and the Peshawar High Court, however, such a jurisdiction is subject to the rule of ownership, according to which if any High Court has jurisdiction over the matter. , The Second High Court, which has jurisdiction over the matter, may restrain itself from exercising its jurisdiction. In the present case, the property demands that the subsequent Election Commission of Pakistan order should have been challenged in the jurisdiction of the Islamabad High Court and the Peshawar High Court. The court should not have been involved and said that the High Court should also not be without determining Q. The jurisdiction of the jurisdiction was initially jurisdiction of the Islamabad High Court against the order of the Election Commission of Pakistan. Was requested and subsequently challenged before the Peshawar High Court by a decree passed by the Election Commission of Pakistan in the post-remand proceedings and the question of jurisdiction was not raised before the Islamabad High Court. Was not before the Peshawar High Court and since both the courts Therefore, the orders of the Peshawar High Court along with the Islamabad High Court were adopted in the exercise of legal powers and objections were made in this regard. A. jobs for advocates from Kasur lawyer