MIAN MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD SABIR
Article 188 Review of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 of the judgment and order by the Supreme Court suit for the specific performance of the contract. Regular second appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment of the appellate court, the High Court dismissed the limitation despite the fact that the divergent finding of fact recorded by the trial court and the appellate court was the facts between the appellate and trial courts. The record needed to be checked for conflicting views on. A detailed order was summoned by the High Court to come to the appropriate conclusion approved by the High Court, and the case was remanded by the Supreme Court, the application was changed to appeal, a law passed by the High Court for fresh judgment. After confirming all appropriate hearing opportunities. Related \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Jacobabad lawyer