TOWN COMMITTEE, PIPLAN THROUGH TEHSIL NAZIM versus MUHAMMAD HANIF
Section (()) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The Justice High Court's administration could have followed the principles laid down in a decision, in which the matters raised in the present case were decided. , Or at least it should have been adopted. Earlier, the matter could have been settled by considering the material raised by the parties and by passing the Speaking Order instead of merely observing that the court had already decided all such questions, it was the duty of the High Court after the hearing. Is able to handle all aspects of the case. Considering the advice and facts of the parties and the circumstances of the case as well as the previous law, if available, the High Court did not approve the controversial decision in accordance with the law, the appeal was not upheld and the appeal was converted to appeal An unexpected order has been settled and after providing the opportunity for a hearing to all concerned, the case has been forwarded to the High Court for fresh settlement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
