Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus MOHABBAT KHAN

Section 302/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The appeal against the principles to be acquitted by the trial court and the High Court was dismissed concurrently but the charges were dropped. The conclusions of the two courts were neither serious facts nor legal. Neither weak nor perverse, the complainant who sought the intervention of the Supreme Court has failed to convince the Supreme Court that acquittal of the guilty in the safe management of criminal justice and the culprit is a double concept of innocence in favor of the Supreme Court. Will refuse to interfere with the decision. Unless there were very strong reasons on record in regards to the error of judgment, the fact that their testimony was natural and that it was not enough to believe or deny the evidence when it occurred in the light of day, was not the actual test. Was whether the witnesses were truthful and confident based on the strange facts of the case. To be relied upon for sentencing pro, the securitization evidence did not meet such a test to the satisfaction of the two courts, and the Supreme Court did not find any good reason to disagree with the High Court, which refused to appeal. when you need a advocate from Kasur lawyer