Find a Lawyer

AHMAD NAWAZ versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 392 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 sentenced to scrutiny of evidence, lack of eye witness statement was not scattered through the defense despite a lengthy defense investigation at the relevant place. The witnesses 'presence proved at the time that the parties knew each other, an FIR was immediately filed in the light of that day, medical reports confirmed the witnesses' statement, the crime was cleared from the scene and Minor conflicts did not affect the prosecution's case immediately after the incident, with blood reclaimed land reclamation and the complainant's statement What proved beyond any doubt was that the culprits of the accused were retained and as a result the accused had earlier stopped the victim and his sister from robbing them, but that was when the victim resisted. The offer was fired list of supreme court advocates from Kamokey lawyer