Find a Lawyer

SAEED KHAN versus STATE

Sections 302 and 148 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185, immediately examined the evidence for filing an FIR, excluding the possibility of dialogue and consultation with others to implicate the accused. The details of the incident were clearly made in the FIR, supported by ocular evidence through medical evidence, litigation with the witnesses and the release of the pallets. Was offered by the prosecution, because it needed to prove the charges and to give the witnesses sufficient evidence Rory. Evidence was brought to the record No evidence can be given about the testimony of the remaining witnesses when in the absence of any positive evidence, the incident came to light in the daytime and the witnesses were natural witnesses to the incident. Didn't read, read, or misread. There was no unlawful interference in the Impressive Judgment of the evidence. Regular appeals were dismissed in due course. best advocate from Naukot lawyer