MAZHAR IQBAL versus D.C.O. TOBA TEK SINGH
Article 9 The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) disputes between the parties concerned the amount of care for the applicant's children, which, despite having knowledge of the proceedings by the arbitration council, On the due date and on many other dates, the High Court upheld the authorities' finding under the High Court that it was found that the previous recovery was Rs one thousand a month and Rs 1500 per month. The applicant was obliged in this case to care for the future. Under the Islamic law, the District Liaison Officer for the provision of rehabilitation of children, in the matter of facts and matters, has requested in his jurisdiction that the review petition filed by the applicant be rejected while banned. However, the Supreme Court will not interfere with the amount of maintenance provided by the authorized forum. In the absence of any unusual circumstances, the applicant cannot demonstrate how the Arbitration Council was not properly constituted; no legal impairment request was encountered, any question regarding the law of public importance Was not included to guarantee the intervention of the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Eminabad lawyer