ABDUL SALIM versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SECONDARY, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) grounds for termination of employment, the mention of the official irregularities committed at the time of appointment was made and obtained by the Government employee in the year 1995 as the school teacher. had lived. In the year 1997, permanently in the year 1997, the government terminated the services of the public servant and his departmental appeal was also rejected. The service tribunal upheld the authorities' decision, only to have the order removed from the service emphasize that the appointment was found illegal by a public servant, but no details were given. For this reason the absence of its own reasons was sufficient to explain its removal if there was a specific reason and it was reported. By showcasing notice to the public servant, the public servant may be able to defend himself against this irregularity. Being a permanent institution of a level government cannot be condemned, its orders cannot be changed simply because the heads have changed such a process. The court was unfair when the candidate was fully qualified to control the job, the Supreme Court reversed the appeal for leave in appeal, set aside the order to terminate the job and restored the government employee to the job. Appeal allowed later
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Piplan lawyer