Find a Lawyer

RUKHSAR AHMAD versus STATE

Section 616161A of the IJ of the Islamic Criminal Procedure Enforcement Act (I44 of 44), Section 15 / Pen Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 307/109 to stop the District Court of Judicial Jurisdiction. Order was approved on 14 5 2005. The case was referred to the Additional District Court of Criminal Jurisdiction `D but the order was subsequently dismissed before the Additional District Court in 2 2005, and the case was dismissed and any party The trial was continued without any objection to. It was intended that both these orders be illegal and that all proceedings made by the District Court-approved trial court after 14 5 2005 be terminated, the territorial jurisdiction of the two courts was determined by the official notification. Gone, the matter cannot be further escalated. The District Court of Criminal Jurisdiction, recognizing the legal aspect, faced any unlawful trial of the District Court of Criminal Jurisdiction M without a ruling, without an order, by a subsequent order. Neither had any injustice been done to any of the accused, who had made extraordinary pleas without taking advantage of the clauses provided in the form of review, without the inherent powers of a court of law. Who were on bail by the accused who were only on bail, only action I was late and the petition was dismissed for a long time. best advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer