Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD SHAH JAHAN versus STATE

Section 497 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Crimes for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Act 1985, Sections 10, 11 and 16 bail plea was denied against the refusal of the trial under which the applicant was denied bail. The PC reported that she, a BA final student, was 18 years old, Victim was taken to another city 300 km away from home, and was forced to [sign the contract and other documents. ? They were also pressured to make a statement before the Special Judicial Magistrate in favor of the spouses' free will based on the accused marriage, the use of force for the purpose was not allowed because such a process would seriously affect the authenticity of the contract. Doubt will arise Submitted to the sub-divisional magistrate and he recorded his statement under Section 1064 CCPC, in which he was charged with a fine under Sections 10 and 11, Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Enforcement Hood). Medical reports related to the victim under the Act 1985 stated that the lawyer based on the allegation that the deceased had gone to another city with his free will, it cannot be considered that the accused has There is an anti-prima fee case and it cannot be said that the court had committed an error in denial. Guarantee of the accused best advocate from Cherat lawyer