Find a Lawyer

REHMAT DIN versus STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL

Definition of Section 302 Evidence The benefit of the doubt was based on the skepticism of the entire prosecutor's story, which was expressed through the confessional statements of the prosecution's witnesses, the defendants and the accused. Another prosecution witness did not witness the story about the motive, which was part of the incident, and could not be. Examined as he died before making a statement, there was no evidence, in the circumstances supporting the contradiction of the alleged motive regarding the whereabouts of the weapons, serious suspicion about the recovery of the weapons of crime. The prosecutor claimed that at that time, the accused used a cloth to cover his body to cover his body, it was stained in blood, and after that incident he had given it to him. Hiding behind a box in his house. It cannot be believed that the accused was accused of plotting to murder his daughter-in-law and his daughter-in-law and his daughter-in-law. And he tried to set the deceased's house on fire, keeping a piece of evidence against him for more than 12 days, according to the prosecution's case, the defendant's confessional statement, filed the same day by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, but no evidence No, pointing out that the accused expressed his consent or requested the magistrate to record the statement, it was brought on record that the mystery was shrouded to the accused who was brought before the magistrate for this purpose. While no one has identified the accused who recorded the confessional statement. His identity card or any other source of identification was not mentioned in the statement Recovery of the crime weapon was suspicious and blood was shed on the instance of the accused. tax advocates from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer