NAZAKAT ALI versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34 and 506 bail, further investigation grant was alleged by the accused allegedly using a 12-bore gun and was declared deadly injury. The accused's case was completely different. The principle accused / co-accused was allegedly armed with a stick and picked up Lalcara stock for non-use in the incident, only for the matter of sharing a common intention. It can be ascertained that after recording the evidence and going to the incident only in this case, the section 34 PPC will not refer to the joint intention contemplated by the case, even if the accused himself acted, Or at the instance of a co-accused, that can be ascertained only after the trial court has recorded the evidence. The accused attributed to Lalakara, which was a matter of further investigation within the meaning of section 497 CCPC (2), the accused was admitted in bail, under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Haripur lawyer