Find a Lawyer

NASIMA BIBI versus STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL

Definition of Section 2 (2 (b)) of the evidence was liable to be filed and the prosecution could not prove that the fact of filing the FIR was neither recorded nor in charge. The police station was screened, which did not even file an FIR before the trial. The judicial FIR was also defective and had no clear value as it was recorded after consultation and consideration. The facts and circumstances have shown that the FIR was fabricated and these incidents can be reduced to the written record of the investigating officer who made the false statement. The evidence of the prosecution's witnesses regarding the filing of the IR was not only contradictory and contradictory to itself, but no credible record could prove that the prosecution's witnesses had previously investigated the suspect and his case. He later filed an FIR, but did not choose to name the suspects. The story of the alleged extra-judicial confession was false, fictitious, suspicious and confusing, and did not provide any support for the prosecution's version because the suspect himself. , Although it may be strong, it was not enough to replace the evidence to substantiate the accused's guilt, except for Hecht. All the recoveries have not been identified on the suspect. Such evidence cannot be relied upon because a headshot was found near the closet of the room, a place that was readily accessible to all family members about the discovery of the chemical examiner and the crime weapon. According to the doctor's opinion and his evidence, the accused was killed by the accused, under section 2342, CRPC. online advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer