Section 17 (8) and 17 (9) non-payment of rent arrears for payment of rent by default The tenant's dispute with the controller of the attack on the defense was that the order was prompt and mechanical. The way was approved and the rent. The controller had no jurisdiction to pass orders for rent arrears for more than three years. The property was not made by the tenants only in order to determine the arrears of the rent, a summary inquiry was to be made only by the rent controller, which was made in the present case, once the temporary control of the rent by the controller. If the rent order was approved, the tenant was obliged to comply with the order and if he was not satisfied with the order, he should have challenged the same before the Majlis Forum, not by the tenant default by the tenant. Was done, established. It was properly defended by a day's delay in paying the rent / submission of the court, and the landlord had a valuable right and did not waive the delay in the absence of reliable and credible reasons. Could go In a similar case, the situation was worse as far as the tenant was concerned, as he had not deposited the rent amount and in this case the rent controller failed to comply with the tenant rental order. Which was apparently a prohibited order preventing the landlord from withdrawing the lease until the final decision on the rental matters and the question about the rental rate and the actual arrears of rent was decided based on the evidence of the parties. Had to be
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
