Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI

R 4 (1) (b) (ii) After making a mandatory retirement, charge sheet from the Appellant serving as a Senior Assistant in the National Bank Employees Service Rules, 1980 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Bank. He must have retired from the job. And the respondents conducting inquiries on certain allegations of corruption made a fair inquiry against the appellant after presenting the charge sheet, despite the fact that the National Bank Employees Service Rules, 1980, applied the rules of law in this case. was not. The appellant also admitted his guilt by submitting an affidavit by the inquiry officer and was reasonably considered, though the respondent did not cause any significant harm to the respondent as per the inquiry officer's report. But the only reason for the compulsory retirement lower sentence was given to the appellant, otherwise the appellant would be dismissed and the matter presented to the police in favor of the part-time appellant for which the respondent. Respondents expressed their sympathy for them. The conviction imposed by the appellant was not harsh or harsh because the accused was charged by the appellant even if the reasons for the orders passed by the respondent authority were not stated, but it was not a technical error. Any prejudice to appeal to the appellant cannot be successful due to the appeal by the appellant that his reasons were not mentioned in the relevant orders by the competent authority and the appellate authority. had gone. top advocates from Usta Mohammad lawyer