SAJJAD AHMED JAVED BHATTI versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Sections 9 and 22 (2) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Promotion, the right to appeal for service tribunal appellant came through nominated notification under which the appellant was dismissed while his juniors were dismissed by the police. Promoted to BPS 22 Appellant joining Service. On 1 10 1970, Pakistan was given a step-by-step development over several years, and their last development was in BPS-21. The appellant claimed that he was fully qualified and progressed in BPS-22. Meets the required criteria for, but was ignored without giving a reason. The record confirms that the appellant's case was regularly presented / presented to the Prime Minister along with a list of 26 police service officers, of whom the appellant was also the first The bar is being considered for BPS 22. Appellant's service record was as good as reflecting panel pro forma, appellant's service record, ACR quantities, staff college / NDC courses, etc. If not better, progress from this private panel None of the two private respondents who were found to have stood in the way of the appellant's advertisement and no reasons for not advertising the Appellant Service Tribunal were, in the circumstances, the appellant. Directed in the case of BPS 22 promotion r \ n to be placed before the Prime Minister again for development.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
