HAFIZ SANA ULLAH versus DIRECTOR (ADMN.) POWER-II, WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE
The appeal regarding the limitation of section 4 appeals was resisted on the basis that the ban was imposed at the same time as the appellant had requested to be transferred from 1 12 1996 when the appeal was filed on 13 9 2000. ? Every month the appellant was getting low pay, every month there was a fresh cause of action in favor of the provisions of section 23 of the Limitation Act, 1908, which dealt with the reasons for the proceedings, by the appellant. The ban was not punctual because it had a consistent cause of action and the wrongs it did were not resolved.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Killa Abdullah lawyer
