Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KHALIQ versus MANAGING DIRECTOR (POWER) WAPDA, LAHORE

Section 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Transfer Challenge for the Appellant which was transferred from the workplace to the `C working place 'Q certain challenged the transfer on some grounds in which this transfer The order was also approved by a disqualifier. Authority and that it could not be transferred from the jurisdiction (in which he was appointed) the appellant in another jurisdiction accepted his appointment on the basis of his Appointment Order of All Terms and Conditions contained in the Appointment Order. Circulars / instructions were rejected. One of the terms of the appointment order regarding the terms and conditions of their appointment clearly states that the applicant will be required to serve the authority anywhere within the Pakistan appellant, in view of this condition, in Pakistan. Can be moved anywhere and cannot claim. That it could not be relocated from the place `C from to Q` and that the transfer was made in view of the fact that the Executive Engineer was merely a representative of the authority in which the appellant was employed. He was higher than the Executive Engineer, enabling the appellant to transfer. According to the authority, which was more than an Executive Engineer Appellant, he was not employed for only one constituency, but he was employed all over Pakistan and could be posted or transferred anywhere in Pakistan. Which he was assigned to another constituency, he was repulsed, under circumstances in r \ n registration advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer