Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL REMOUNTS, VETY AND FARMS CORPS, RAWALPINDI

RR 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 requires the appellant to investigate against him on this charge. He was subsequently dismissed. The allegation against the appellant against the fake cops for obtaining employment was that his real name was Muhammad Raqib, but he had recorded the case with the evidence of the fake documents as Mohammad Sharif, the court inquiry concluded. That Mohammed Raqib had the strength of Muhammad Sharif to get the job, no action was erred by the court inquiry, the statements of the witnesses were not recorded in the presence of the appellant An inspection was allowed, the appellant was allowed to present his defense appellant at every opportunity before he arrived. The service tribunal filed a civil lawsuit for announcing that his name was Muhammad Sharif, but he failed to call the appellant a declaration by a fraudulent act against him that resulted in a fraudulent offense involving public servants ( Performance and discipline) was defined as the mismanagement made under Rule 1973. The appellant had committed mismanagement for which the authorities were fully qualified to take action against him, and according to the rules the appellant was strictly dismissed. immigration advocate from Vehari lawyer