Find a Lawyer

INTIZAR HUSSAIN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION, KARACHI

R4 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Appellant was retired from employment on the grounds that he must be absent from duty under retirement who has exceeded Rs 1 lakh for his pension benefits. Was received. In the event of rehabilitation, all benefits accrued from the interest will have to be returned, but the appellant has stated that the applicant has no money to pay the applicant. It is to be restored and the money received by it will be provided for its pension benefits. His monthly salary could be adjusted, which could not be obtained because he had to return a larger amount after the failure by the maintenance appellant to demonstrate a refund, for his mandatory retirement. His appeal against was not a competent appellant, he received full pension benefits and was denied a refund, there was no locus standi to file an appeal. registration advocate from Haripur lawyer